Goal:
The goal of this plan is to
determine if the use of iPad assistive technology in special education
classrooms of Wheatley School of Early Childhood Programs (WECP) will impact
and/or improve student learning and performance of children with disabilities.
|
|||||||||||||
Action
Steps(s):
|
Person(s)
Responsible:
|
Timeline:
Start/End
|
Needed
Resources
|
Evaluation
|
|||||||||
Step
1 ~ Examining the Work: Setting the Foundation
|
|||||||||||||
Obtain
permission of Wheatley Principal and PAISD Director of Special Education to
conduct action research inquiry project.
|
Mary Oakley
|
October
/ November 2012
|
Documents indicating
permission to conduct inquiry.
|
N/A
|
|||||||||
Review current resources related to educational
technology available to WECP special education teachers and students.
|
Mary Oakley
IT Technician Supervisor
Secretary of Director of Sp Ed
|
November
/ December 2012
|
Documentation detailing and listing available campus
technology for special education students.
|
Document existing technology used to enhance learning of
special education students; include software, hardware and individuals.
|
|||||||||
Recognition of expansion of technological capability and resources
with the arrival of eight Apple iPads
for use in each of the Special Education classrooms of WECP.
|
Sp Ed Director
Principal
|
Late
October 2012
|
iPad technology is
available to students and
faculty at WECP.
|
Document receipt of iPad technology by WECP Sp Ed
teachers at the direction of the Director of Sp Ed Division, PAISD.
|
|||||||||
Literature search on use of technology in special
education classrooms, specifically Apple iPad technology.
|
October / December 2012
|
Google search engine; LU Library database; NAESP; NASSP
and other profession organization websites.
|
Recognize the enormous amount of information available
on capabilities of software in the classroom.
Remain focused on action research topic information.
|
||||||||||
Step
2 ~ Analyzing Data
|
|||||||||||||
Introduce action research topic to WECP Lead Special
Education Teacher and obtain permission and feedback.
|
Mary Oakley
Sp Ed Director
Principal
Lead WECP PPCD Teacher
|
November
28, 2012
|
Discussions with Lead Teacher yielded positive reaction
and enthusiasm about the action research topic.
|
||||||||||
Examine different
data gathering strategies presented in text.
|
Mary Oakley
|
December
2012
|
N. F. Dana text; Week
3 Assignment
|
Increased researcher
knowledge regarding strategies to implement in data collection.
|
|||||||||
Survey special education teachers at WECP regarding
their level of comfort with available technology in general and iPad
technology in particular. Survey will
identify technology is available to teachers and students in each of the
eight Programs for Children with Disabilities (PPCD) class
|
Mary Oakley
Sp Ed Director
Principal
Eight (8) WECP PPCD Teachers
Any of the eight (8) para- professionals interested in
this topic.
|
December2012 / January
2013
|
Survey in which the questions are appropriately phrased
to solicit needed and meaningful information.
|
Determination of technological skill level of teachers.
Data collected by surveys will be evaluated and graphed
using Microsoft Office Excel spreadsheet software.
|
|||||||||
Conduct interviews with PPCD teachers to explore if the
teachers feel that iPad technology will enhance learning of special education
students?
|
Mary Oakley
Principal
Eight (8)
WECP PPCD Teachers
|
February
2013
|
Interview questions; tape recorder; interview notes.
|
Reflect upon
information gained from interviews.
|
|||||||||
Establish
baseline(s): teacher technological
skill levels; current use of technology in PPCD classrooms.
Analyze data to determine baseline student performance.
|
Mary Oakley
Diagnostician
WECP Records Clerk
PAISD Sp Ed Records
Clerk
|
February
2013
|
Compilation of survey
and interview data.
First and Second Six
Weeks Student Progress Reports of 2012-2013 school year
Data collected from
student hard-copy and electronic files.
|
Review of the analysis of survey and interview data
compilation.
|
|||||||||
Step
3 ~ Developing Deeper Understanding
|
|||||||||||||
Focus Group Meeting ~
Discuss findings with Principal, Special Education
Director, Diagnostician and PPCD Teachers and receive feedback.
|
Mary
Oakley
Principal
Eight (8)
WECP PPCD Teachers
|
February 2013
|
Attendance of and input from Principal, Special Education Director,
Diagnostician and PPCD Teachers
|
Discussions with responsible persons for collaboration
of different perspectives and input by all school stakeholders.
|
|||||||||
Active listening will also be used to gain a deeper
understanding of this topic.
|
Mary
Oakley
Eight (8)
WECP PPCD Teachers
|
February
/ May 2013
|
Collaboration and sharing of information among
stakeholders.
|
Consider depth and
breadth of information gained.
|
|||||||||
Classroom
observations of student engaged in iPad Technology use.
|
Mary
Oakley
Principal
Eight (8)
WECP PPCD Teachers
|
February
/ May 2013
|
PPCD
students; document observations
|
Observation of iPad
use by PPCD students will provide a contextual viewpoint.
|
|||||||||
Step
4 ~ Engaging in Self-Reflection
|
|||||||||||||
Review of EDLD 5311:
Fundamental of Leadership self-assessments and coursework.
|
Mary Oakley
|
December
2012 / May 2013
|
EDLD 5311 Coursework Binder(s)
|
N/A
|
|||||||||
Complete Harris 4.1:
Who Am I? and 4.2: What Biases Do I Have? Self-Reflection Tools
|
Mary Oakley
|
January
2013 / February 2013
|
Harris Textbook
|
N/A
|
|||||||||
Step
5 ~ Exploring Programmatic Patterns
|
|||||||||||||
The over-assignment
or disproportionate numbers of African American males in special education is
a programmatic pattern that has long been recognized as a gross inequity in
U.S. schools.
|
Mary
Oakley
Eight (8) WECP PPCD Teachers
|
December 2012 /
Ongoing
|
Current educational journal articles and studies
related to over-repre-sentation of
Black males in Special Education classes
|
N/A
|
|||||||||
Assistive technology
use by special education students must correlate to the individual education
plan (IEP) prepared for each student.
|
Mary Oakley
Eight (8) WECP PPCD Teachers
|
December
2012 / Ongoing
|
Access to student IEPs.
|
N/A
|
|||||||||
Step
6 ~ Determining Direction
|
|||||||||||||
Assess progress
and/or lack of progress by PPCD students utilizing iPad technology in Special
Education classrooms.
|
Mary Oakley
Eight (8)
WECP PPCD Teachers
|
February
2013 / Ongoing
|
Assessment of accumulated data.
|
Evaluate if teachers
are taking advantage of iPad technology in PPCD classrooms.
|
|||||||||
Revisit previous
goals and priorities; determine areas where more information is needed;
recognize limitations.
|
Mary
Oakley
|
February
2013 / Ongoing
|
Assessment of accumulated data. Notes on previous goals.
|
Make any necessary
adjustments to action research plan.
|
|||||||||
Make a presentation
of monitored progress of research to involved stakeholders – “Where We Are Now”
|
Mary
Oakley
|
Early
March 2013
|
Attendance of and input from stakeholders.
|
Share information
with stakeholders.
|
|||||||||
Collaborate with
Special Education professional learning community (PLC) to reach consensus on
the direction and develop actions necessary to improve.
|
Mary Oakley
Eight (8) WECP PPCD Teachers
|
February
2013 / Ongoing
|
Attendance of and
input from Special Education Director,
Diagnostician and PPCD Teachers
|
Review information
shared at meetings to determine if there is any problem that needs to be
addressed as far as using the technology.
|
|||||||||
Step
7 ~ Taking Action on School Improvement
|
|||||||||||||
Special Education
professional learning community (PLC)
becomes the improvement action committee
|
Mary
Oakley
Principal
Eight (8) WECP PPCD Teachers
|
February
2013 / Ongoing
|
Attendance
of and input from Special Education
Director, Diagnostician and PPCD Teachers
|
Action research
becomes a collaborative effort within WECP involving teachers in shaping the
direction for forward progress.
|
|||||||||
Continuous monitoring
of the implementation and use of iPad technology in PPCD classrooms.
|
Mary Oakley
Principal
Eight (8) WECP PPCD Teachers
|
February
2013 / Ongoing
|
Cooperation
of and input from PPCD Teachers
|
Summative evaluation combining
quantitative and qualitative source of data will be used.
|
|||||||||
Step
8 ~ Sustaining Improvement
|
|||||||||||||
Keep abreast of
identified educational trends which include:
v
A
shift in the majority/ minority groups of the US population.
v
An
increase in the availability of technology.
v
An
increase in the need for consideration of varying points of view.
|
Mary Oakley
|
October
2012 / Ongoing
|
Websites of professional educator organizations
eSchool News emails and magazine
subscriptions
Attend webinars dealing with research topic
|
N/A
|
|||||||||
Design and
disseminate questionnaire for completion by PPCD teachers as to future needs
and goals for sustaining improvement and which improvement activities should
be continued?
|
Mary Oakley
Eight (8) WECP PPCD Teachers
|
March
2013
|
Appropriate knowledge to design questionnaire asking
the right questions.
|
Compilation of survey
answers provided by PPCD Teachers.
|
|||||||||
Conduct
analyses for continuous update of action research data employing the
following techniques:
v
Force
Field Analysis
v Delphi Method
v Nominal Group Model
|
Mary Oakley
Eight (8) WECP PPCD Teachers
|
March
2013 / May 2013
|
Harris textbook
|
Assemble data
received from multiple analyses.
|
|||||||||
Prepare action
research project paper and share significant
information learned with all stakeholders and interested community members.
|
Mary Oakley
|
March
2013 / Ongoing
|
oakleymaryr.
blosgspot.com
https://.site. google/sites. maryroakley
Actionresearch5301.blogspot.com
|
Feedback from visitors to Google websites,
blog pages, and conversations with stakeholders
|
|||||||||
References:
Dana,
N.F. (2009). Leading with passion and knowledge: The principal as action
researcher. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin
Press.
Edyburn,
D.L. (2002) Assistive technology and the IEP. Special Education
Technology
Practice, 4(3), 15-22.
Copyright Knowledge by Design, Inc.
Harris, S., Edmonson, S., & Combs, J. (2009). Examining
what we do to
improve our schools: 9 steps from analysis to
action. Larchmont, N.Y.: Eye on
Education.
WOW!!! This is such a well thought out plan. I love the amount of detail you have put into your template. I have one thought. You have an action listed that I am not so sure relates completely to the use of Ipad technology and student improvement.
ReplyDelete"The over-assignment or disproportionate numbers of African American males in special education is a programmatic pattern that has long been recognized as a gross inequity in U.S. schools."
I'm not sure that you need to include this in your specific action research plan. In my way of thinking, this would be a topic of action research all on its own.
My mentor advised me to pare down my plan to only those things that directly relate to the achievement based on technology. While this is a very important topic and one worth exploring, does it really relate to your action research topic?
To quote my kids...... "Just Saying."
Good Luck
Thank you for "Just Saying." Your comments are appreciated and relevant.
DeleteIn regaqrd to the overrepresentation of African American males in special education, I identified that as a programmatic pattern. You are correct ~ it is definitely worth studying, but probably not in my particular action research plan on the introduction of iPad technology into special education classrooms at Wheatley School.
Excellent point, and again, thanks.
~Oakley
I added this comment in my assignment. Further thanks.
DeleteAnother substantive point made by Ms. Andrews was the paring down of the action research plan to include only those matters which relate directly to technology. I appreciate this comment because it helps me to refocus on the purpose of my action research.
This is exactly the type of feedback that was discussed in the Week 4 Introduction video by Dr. Jenkins and Dr. Arterbury: “Cooperative learning, .. is much faster and goes beyond individual learning, and typically results in logical conclusions.” Ms. Andrews’ comments are an example of the collaborative brainstorming which comes from good support systems.