Followers

Sunday, December 9, 2012


 
Action Research Plan
 
Goal:  The goal of this plan is to determine if the use of iPad assistive technology in special education classrooms of Wheatley School of Early Childhood Programs (WECP) will impact and/or improve student learning and performance of children with disabilities.
 
Action Steps(s):
Person(s) Responsible:
Timeline: Start/End
Needed Resources
Evaluation
Step 1 ~  Examining the Work:  Setting the Foundation
Obtain permission of Wheatley Principal and PAISD Director of Special Education to conduct action research inquiry project.
 
Mary Oakley
October / November 2012
Documents indicating permission to conduct inquiry.
 
N/A
 
Review current resources related to educational technology available to WECP special education teachers and students.
Mary Oakley
IT Technician Supervisor
Secretary of Director of Sp Ed
 
November / December 2012
Documentation detailing and listing available campus technology for special education students.
Document existing technology used to enhance learning of special education students; include software, hardware and individuals.
 
 
Recognition of expansion of   technological capability and resources with the arrival of   eight Apple iPads for use in each of the Special Education classrooms of WECP.
Sp Ed Director
Principal
Late October 2012
iPad technology is   available to students and faculty at WECP.
Document receipt of iPad technology by WECP Sp Ed teachers at the direction of the Director of Sp Ed Division, PAISD.
 
Literature search on use of technology in special education classrooms, specifically Apple iPad technology.
 
 
 
 
October /   December 2012
 
Google search engine; LU Library database; NAESP; NASSP and other profession organization websites.
Recognize the enormous amount of information available on capabilities of software in the classroom.  Remain focused on action research topic information.
 
Step 2 ~ Analyzing Data
 
Introduce action research topic to WECP Lead Special Education Teacher and obtain permission and feedback.
 
Mary Oakley
 
Sp Ed Director
Principal
Lead WECP PPCD Teacher
 
November 28, 2012
 
 
Discussions with Lead Teacher yielded positive reaction and enthusiasm about the action research topic.
 
Examine different data gathering strategies presented in text.
 
 
Mary Oakley
 
December 2012
 
N. F. Dana text; Week 3 Assignment
 
Increased researcher knowledge regarding strategies to implement in data collection.
 
 
 
Survey special education teachers at WECP regarding their level of comfort with available technology in general and iPad technology in particular.  Survey will identify technology is available to teachers and students in each of the eight Programs for Children with Disabilities (PPCD) class
 
Mary Oakley
 
Sp Ed Director
Principal
Eight (8) WECP PPCD Teachers
Any of the eight (8) para- professionals interested in this topic.
 
 
 
December2012 / January
2013
 
 
Survey in which the questions are appropriately phrased to solicit needed and meaningful information.
 
 
 
Determination of technological skill level of teachers.
Data collected by surveys will be evaluated and graphed using Microsoft Office Excel spreadsheet software.
 
Conduct interviews with PPCD teachers to explore if the teachers feel that iPad technology will enhance learning of special education students?
Mary Oakley
Principal
Eight (8) WECP PPCD Teachers
 
February 2013
Interview questions; tape recorder; interview notes.
Reflect upon information gained from interviews.
Establish baseline(s):  teacher technological skill levels; current use of technology in PPCD classrooms.
 
Analyze data to determine baseline student performance.
 
 
Mary Oakley
 
Diagnostician
 
WECP Records Clerk
 
PAISD Sp Ed Records Clerk
 
 
February 2013
Compilation of survey and interview data.
First and Second Six Weeks Student Progress Reports of 2012-2013 school year
Data collected from student hard-copy and electronic files.
 
Review of the analysis of survey and interview data compilation.
 
Step 3 ~ Developing Deeper Understanding
 
Focus Group Meeting ~
 
Discuss findings with Principal, Special Education Director, Diagnostician and PPCD Teachers and receive feedback.
 
 
 
Mary Oakley
Principal
Eight (8) WECP PPCD Teachers
 
 
 
 
February 2013
 
Attendance of and input from  Principal, Special Education Director, Diagnostician and PPCD Teachers
 
Discussions with responsible persons for collaboration of different perspectives and input by all school stakeholders.
 
 
Active listening will also be used to gain a deeper understanding of this topic.
 
Mary Oakley
 
Eight (8) WECP PPCD Teachers
 
February /  May 2013
 
Collaboration and sharing of information among stakeholders.
Consider depth and breadth of information gained.
Classroom observations of student engaged in iPad Technology use.
Mary Oakley
 
Principal
Eight (8) WECP PPCD Teachers
 
February /  May 2013
PPCD students; document observations
Observation of iPad use by PPCD students will provide a contextual viewpoint.
Step 4 ~ Engaging in Self-Reflection
Review of EDLD 5311: Fundamental of Leadership self-assessments and coursework.
 
Mary Oakley
 
December 2012 / May 2013
 
EDLD 5311 Coursework Binder(s)
 
 
N/A
Complete Harris 4.1: Who Am I? and 4.2: What Biases Do I Have? Self-Reflection Tools
 
Mary Oakley
January 2013 / February 2013
 
Harris Textbook
 
N/A
Step 5 ~ Exploring Programmatic Patterns
The over-assignment or disproportionate numbers of African American males in special education is a programmatic pattern that has long been recognized as a gross inequity in U.S. schools. 
 
Mary Oakley
 
Eight (8) WECP PPCD Teachers
 
 
December 2012 / Ongoing
 
Current educational journal articles and studies related to over-repre-sentation of
Black males in Special Education classes
 
 
 
 
 
N/A
Assistive technology use by special education students must correlate to the individual education plan (IEP) prepared for each student.
Mary Oakley
 
Eight (8) WECP PPCD Teachers
 
December 2012 / Ongoing
 
Access to student IEPs.
 
 
N/A
Step 6 ~ Determining Direction
Assess progress and/or lack of progress by PPCD students utilizing iPad technology in Special Education classrooms.
Mary Oakley
 
Eight (8) WECP PPCD Teachers
 
February 2013 / Ongoing
 
Assessment of accumulated data.
Evaluate if teachers are taking advantage of iPad technology in PPCD classrooms.
Revisit previous goals and priorities; determine areas where more information is needed; recognize limitations.
Mary Oakley
 
 
February 2013 / Ongoing
Assessment of accumulated data.  Notes on previous goals.
Make any necessary adjustments to action research plan.
Make a presentation of monitored progress of research to involved stakeholders – “Where We Are Now”
Mary Oakley
 
 
Early March 2013
Attendance of and input from  stakeholders.
Share information with stakeholders.
Collaborate with Special Education professional learning community (PLC) to reach consensus on the direction and develop actions necessary to improve.
 
Mary Oakley
Eight (8) WECP PPCD Teachers
 
 
February 2013 / Ongoing
Attendance of and input from  Special Education Director, Diagnostician and PPCD Teachers
 
Review information shared at meetings to determine if there is any problem that needs to be addressed as far as using the technology.
Step 7 ~ Taking Action on School Improvement
Special Education professional learning community (PLC)  becomes the improvement action committee
 
Mary Oakley
 
Principal
 
Eight (8) WECP PPCD Teachers
 
February 2013 / Ongoing
Attendance of and input from  Special Education Director, Diagnostician and PPCD Teachers
 
Action research becomes a collaborative effort within WECP involving teachers in shaping the direction for forward progress.
Continuous monitoring of the implementation and use of iPad technology in PPCD classrooms.
Mary Oakley
Principal
 
Eight (8) WECP PPCD Teachers
 
February 2013 / Ongoing
Cooperation of and input from  PPCD Teachers
Summative evaluation combining quantitative and qualitative source of data will be used.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Step 8 ~ Sustaining Improvement
Keep abreast of identified educational trends which include:
v A shift in the majority/ minority groups of the US population.
v An increase in the availability of technology.
v An increase in the need for consideration of varying points of view.
 
Mary Oakley
 
 
 
 
October 2012 /  Ongoing
 
Websites of professional educator organizations
 
eSchool News emails and magazine subscriptions
 
Attend webinars dealing with research topic
 
 
 
N/A
Design and disseminate questionnaire for completion by PPCD teachers as to future needs and goals for sustaining improvement and which improvement activities should be continued?
      Mary Oakley
 
Eight (8) WECP PPCD Teachers
 
 
 
 
March 2013
 
Appropriate knowledge to design questionnaire asking the right questions.
Compilation of survey answers provided by PPCD Teachers.
Conduct analyses for continuous update of action research data employing the following techniques:
v Force Field Analysis
v Delphi Method
v Nominal Group Model
Mary Oakley
 
Eight (8) WECP PPCD Teachers
 
 
 
March 2013 / May 2013
 
 
 
Harris textbook
Assemble data received from multiple analyses.
 
Prepare action research project paper and share significant information learned with all stakeholders and interested community members.
 
Mary Oakley
 
 
March 2013 / Ongoing
oakleymaryr.
blosgspot.com
https://.site. google/sites. maryroakley
Actionresearch5301.blogspot.com
 Feedback from visitors to Google websites, blog pages, and conversations with stakeholders
 


References:

Dana, N.F. (2009). Leading with passion and knowledge: The principal as action

researcher. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. 

Edyburn, D.L. (2002) Assistive technology and the IEP. Special Education

Technology Practice, 4(3), 15-22.  Copyright Knowledge by Design, Inc.  

Harris, S., Edmonson, S., & Combs, J. (2009). Examining what we do to

improve our schools: 9 steps from analysis to action. Larchmont, N.Y.: Eye on Education.
Skria, L., McKenzie, K.B., Scheurich, J.J. (2009). Using Equity Audits to Create

Equitable and Excellent Schools.  Thousand Oaks, Ca:  Corwin Press.   http://media.collegeboard.com/digitalServices/pdf/advocacy/5-Programmatic.pdf.

3 comments:

  1. WOW!!! This is such a well thought out plan. I love the amount of detail you have put into your template. I have one thought. You have an action listed that I am not so sure relates completely to the use of Ipad technology and student improvement.

    "The over-assignment or disproportionate numbers of African American males in special education is a programmatic pattern that has long been recognized as a gross inequity in U.S. schools."

    I'm not sure that you need to include this in your specific action research plan. In my way of thinking, this would be a topic of action research all on its own.

    My mentor advised me to pare down my plan to only those things that directly relate to the achievement based on technology. While this is a very important topic and one worth exploring, does it really relate to your action research topic?

    To quote my kids...... "Just Saying."

    Good Luck

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for "Just Saying." Your comments are appreciated and relevant.

      In regaqrd to the overrepresentation of African American males in special education, I identified that as a programmatic pattern. You are correct ~ it is definitely worth studying, but probably not in my particular action research plan on the introduction of iPad technology into special education classrooms at Wheatley School.

      Excellent point, and again, thanks.

      ~Oakley

      Delete
    2. I added this comment in my assignment. Further thanks.

      Another substantive point made by Ms. Andrews was the paring down of the action research plan to include only those matters which relate directly to technology. I appreciate this comment because it helps me to refocus on the purpose of my action research.
      This is exactly the type of feedback that was discussed in the Week 4 Introduction video by Dr. Jenkins and Dr. Arterbury: “Cooperative learning, .. is much faster and goes beyond individual learning, and typically results in logical conclusions.” Ms. Andrews’ comments are an example of the collaborative brainstorming which comes from good support systems.

      Delete